Monday, 13 December 2021

Iris Publishers_World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health (WJGWH)

Postponing Menopause and Lengthening Fertile Age for Women’s Good Health: A Potential Hope

Summary

Menopause is a critical age in a woman’s life when menstruation stops and is associated with loss of fertility. Deprivation of female hormones, especially estrogen, may be associated with some physical and psychological disorders that greatly affect the quality of life not only for women but also for men and all family members. Therefore, it is important to discuss the possibility of using cryopreservation to postpone menopause in order to alleviate the menopause-associated disorders and ensure better healthy lives for women and societies. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has been used successfully to save the harvested ovary from damage that may result from chemotherapy or radiotherapy used to treat cancer cases. Therefore, we suggest cryopreservation of ovarian samples during reproductive age and re-implantation when needed to postpone the onset of menopause. This may save the resected ovarian tissue from degeneration or consumption that occurs naturally within the human body. This possibility can be verified by prospective studies in volunteers aimed at preserving the endocrine function of the ovaries for as long as possible.

Keywords: Cryopreservation; Menopausal disorders; Good female life; Ovary

Introduction

Menopause is a naturally occurring critical age stage in a woman’s life where menstruation stops and is associated with loss of fertility. It may represent more than one third of the total female lifespan. It is characterized by the depletion of the follicles of the female ovary [1]. Postponing menopause is a hope and demand for many women, especially those who have attended higher education. They may miss the age of marriage for several reasons, including trying to choose a husband that matches the educational and cultural level of the female. Even married women who wish to postpone pregnancy may be affected by menopause. This may cause many problems for the woman, as well as for the husband or partner and all family members, and this may be reflected on their quality of life.

Deprivation of female hormones, especially estrogen, that occurs with the onset of menopause may be associated with some physical and psychological problems that significantly affect the quality of life. Psychological problems include nervous and mental disorders, hot flushes, sleep disturbances and mood disorders. In addition to menstrual loss, physical health problems may include genital atrophy, shrinking breasts, loosening of the skin, reduced subcutaneous tissue, joint pain, decreased bone mass with increased incidence of osteoporosis, vaginal dryness and possibly a loss or decreased libido [2]. Therefore, it is important to discuss the possibility of using new cryopreservation technology to postpone menopause in order to alleviate its associated disorders and ensure better healthy lives for women and societies.

The ovary is the primary female gonad that is located one on each side of the uterus. It is suspended from the uterine cornu, located behind the broad ligament within the Douglas pouch. Ovarian procedures can be easily approached from the vagina through the Douglas pouch under the guidance of ultrasound examination. The ovary consists of two main areas; an external functional area called the cortex and an internal fibrovascular region known as the medulla. The cortex consists mainly of primary ovarian follicles at birth. After puberty and with each reproductive cycle, FSH and LH stimulate some of the primary follicles to grow. Only one of them in most women (or sometimes two or more) reaches maturity and forms a mature graphian follicle. This follicle rupture to release the 2nd oocyte, a process known as ovulation. Although this process consumes some follicles, the process of follicle consumption or degeneration continues in the ovarian cortex throughout the female fertile age, even during periods when the ovary is not working, such as pregnancy after the formation of the placenta or the use of contraceptives. pills [3,4]. The process of ovarian follicles’ depletion is a continuous and steady process throughout the fertile female age till stage of menopause. At menopause, the ovaries lose the oocytes and shrinkage in size with more fibrosis and blurring in the disconnection between regions of cortex and medulla. The mechanism of loss of ovarian follicles is irreversible process because the oogonial stem cells are no longer found after birth [5]. The female has about 450 ovulatory cycles throughout her reproductive lifespan that begins at menarche and ends with the onset of menopause. During such age period, progressive loss of ovarian follicles occurs through cell death known as apoptosis [6].

Ovarian reserve represents condition of the ovarian follicles and potential ability of the female to get pregnancy. It has been investigated by the serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) that represents the best marker for ovarian function [7]. Low level of AMH is an alarm of low ovarian reserve; and the woman might be advised to attempt to be pregnant or try to postpone menopause to preserve fertility. Also, ovarian reserve might be tested by induction of ovulation by gonadotropins. Poor response to induction is an indication of reduced ovarian reserve and hence really occurrence of menopause. The ovarian follicles in human ovary that accounts about 701,000 at birth decreases to reach about 250.000 at sexual puberty. The ovarian reserve continues to diminish with progress of age to reach about 25.000 follicles at 37-38 years old [8]. It nearly disappears at age of menopause that varies from one woman to other but ranges from 45 to 55 years with mean age of 50-51 years. Therefore, the process of achieving ovarian cortex tissues is preferred to be performed at or before the age of 35 years after which marked drop of ovarian reserve might occur. Ovarian reserve varies from one woman to another; and depends on main factors including hereditary, diseases, exposure to radiation, administration of chemotherapy or drugs and other sentimental variables [4].

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation via -150 °C freezers with liquid nitrogen has been successfully used for rescuing the harvested ovary from damage that could be induced by chemo- or radiotherapy used in management cases of cancer. This procedure has been aimed to restore reproductive function and improve quality of life [2,9]. Removal of one ovary has been found to be of no mentioned impact on the function of the other intact ovary or even the age onset of menopause [4]. Therefore, we suggest cryopreservation of some ovarian tissues during the fertile age. This might lead to rescuing the harvested ovarian tissues from degeneration or consumption occurring normally within the human body. Hence, such cryopreserved tissues might be replanted once again at/or around the age of menopause in order to postpone its age onset. This could be investigated in volunteers aiming to preserve endocrine function of ovary as long as possible.

Conclusion

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation may be offered as an option for young women who need to postpone menopause or extend their fertile life. This can be performed through laparoscopic autologous transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian cortical tissue at the expected date of onset of natural menopause. Prospective studies involving volunteers are recommended to investigate the possibility of extending the reproductive age of females for the good health of the wife and husband.

For More Open Access Journals in Iris Publishers Please Click on: https://irispublishers.com/

For More Information:
https://irispublishers.com/wjgwh/fulltext/postponing-menopause-and-lengthening-fertile-age-for-womens-good-health-a-potential-hope.ID.000610.php 


Monday, 29 November 2021

Iris Publishers_World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health (WJGWH)

For Those with Inadequate Legal Documents, COVID-19 Vaccination Remains Challenging

Summary

Mass vaccination against COVID-19 is ever urgent as the incidence of infection with the more contagious and severe Delta variant continues to rise. Though the COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for eligible individuals over the age of twelve and has become widely available to all, it remains elusive for poorly document individuals.

Keywords: Undocumented; Vaccination; COVID-19; Identification; Vulnerable

Keywords: Effectiveness; Feasibility; First line treatment; Office hysteroscopy; Outpatient hysteroscopy; Safety


Opinion

Her name was Maria. She was employed by my next-door neighbor as a house cleaner and was an undocumented alien living in fear of being discovered and deported. Several days ago, my neighbor’s daughter knocked on my door frantically. She explained that Maria had collapsed while cleaning the bathroom and felt extremely short of breath. My first thought was that she had contracted COVID-19 as I raced down the hallway to evaluate her. As I spoke with her in Spanish and examined her, it became clear that she was very anemic as she had been bleeding nonstop for several weeks. She refused to be taken to a hospital or see a doctor as she had neither insurance nor valid legal documentation. So, as a boardcertified OB/GYN and a decent human being, I decided to treat her myself at no cost. Quickly, I discovered the limitations that exist in the health care system for those that are undocumented. Simple tasks such as ordering a complete blood count or medications become nearly impossible tasks.

One of my goals was to get Maria vaccinated for COVID-19 since she has a high risk of becoming severely ill from a COVID-19 infection due to her multiple medical conditions [1]. Additionally, ethnic minorities and socially vulnerable individuals are more likely to experience an increase in disease severity related to COVID-19 resulting in hospitalization, critical care, mechanical ventilation, and even death [2]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends anyone age twelve years and older to plan to get the COVID-19 vaccine [3] and while both the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the CDC promised to make vaccines universally available to those uninsured and those undocumented [4,5] there are significant obstacles that prevent this reality. In the state of New York, proof of age using a valid picture identification is required for obtaining a vaccine [6] which became clear to me after multiple telephone calls to hospitals and city and state health department officials. Maria didn’t have legal identification papers (or at least any that she cared to share with me) and, as such, was turned away from a mass vaccination site and told that she was ineligible for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.

Over ten million undocumented individuals live in the United States each year [7] and without adequate identification and access to vaccination, millions of individuals are highly vulnerable to contracting and inevitably spreading COVID-19. These individuals are undoubtedly the type of patients that need to be vaccinated from a public health stance if not only for their safety but also for the safety of others. In Maria’s case, should she become infected, she could spread the virus to many others as she lives in close quarters with her family and other undocumented individuals. Her social and health circumstances increase her vulnerability, and she could potentially end up in an intensive care unit on a ventilator, costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars [8]. Increasing COVID-19 hospitalizations have a negative net financial impact on health care costs averaging 50 billion dollars monthly according to the American Hospital Association [9]. These rippling effects could have far-reaching financial and public health consequences.

The COVID-19 vaccine, particularly any RNA-based vaccine, has an excellent safety profile, and indications for vaccinations generally far outweigh vaccine-related risks [10]. We urge the federal government, state and local health departments, and hospitals and clinics to make the COVID-19 vaccine available without the need to show identification or prove state residency for adults. In many other cases, such as emergency contraception or IV needle exchange, the United States has recognized harm reduction

programs as integral in attenuating public health consequences [11,12]. Potentially, being able to access vaccines without any barriers would reduce the large number of unvaccinated individuals who are holding out on receiving the vaccine due to lack of legal documentation. This includes not only ten million [7] undocumented immigrants but also the two million individuals who have warrants out for their arrest [13], nine million LGBTQI individuals [13], specifically trans and non-binary individuals who may have identification documents that do not match who they are, and those that simply fear being cataloged into government vaccine databases.

While one reason for verifying a patient’s identity is to properly document that an individual has been vaccinated, a simple vaccination card with a real-time photo (a process similar to state-issued identification cards) and anti-counterfeiting technology could be utilized to positively confirm vaccination status without the need to use legal identification. As new variants of the COVID-19 virus become more contagious and more severe for unvaccinated individuals, as evidenced by the Delta variant, the current rise in incidence linked to these variants makes the need for barrier-free vaccination ever more urgent [14]. At this point, controlling the spread of the pandemic is key, and giving individuals greater autonomy and personal responsibility may help increase vaccination rates.

For More Open Access Journals in Iris Publishers Please Click on: https://irispublishers.com/

For More Information:
https://irispublishers.com/wjgwh/fulltext/for-those-with-inadequate-legal-documents-covid-19-vaccination-remains-challenging.ID.000609.php 




Thursday, 25 November 2021

Iris Publishers

Happy Thanksgiving Day


On behalf of Iris Publishers, it is time to wish everyone on Thanksgiving Day. Thanksgiving wishes to you and your loved ones.


Tuesday, 23 November 2021

Iris Publishers_World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health (WJGWH)

Common Placental Abnormalities Review

Introduction

The placenta is comprised of specialized epithelial cell types, collectively referred to as trophoblast cells, situated among mesenchymal cells and vasculature, at the maternal-fetal interface. Trophoblast stem and progenitor cell populations give rise to specialized trophoblast cell lineages these cells differentiate into trophoblast giant cells, spongiotrophoblast cells, glycogen trophoblast cells, invasive trophoblast cells, and syncytiotrophoblast.

Trophoblast cells are specialized cell types capable of accessing and modifying maternal structures and controlling the bidirectional flow of nutrients and wastes. In humans a hemochorial placenta is formed. This form of placenta is characterized by a limited cellular barrier for maternal-fetal delivery of nutrients and extensive intrauterine trophoblast cell invasion and uterine arterial remodeling.

Although gross inspection and histopathology as well as various chromosome and molecular studies are needed for ultimate diagnosis, ultrasonography is the definitive prenatal modality for evaluating the majority of these conditions.

This manuscript provides an overview of common abnormalities of the human hemochorial placenta with its determination of maternal and fetal health as well as postnatal health and susceptibility to disease.


Placental Structural Variants

Structural placental variants are relatively common and can be diagnosed using ultrasound. Not all forms are known to result in risk for maternal or fetal complications.

Bilobed placenta is a placenta composed of two roughly equal-sized lobes separated by a membrane. It occurs in 2% to 8% of placentas. The umbilical cord may insert in either lobe, in velamentous fashion, or in between the lobes. While there is no increased risk of fetal anomalies with this abnormality, bilobed placentas can be associated with retained placental tissue.

Succenturiate placenta is a condition in which one or more accessory lobes develop in the membranes apart from the main placental body to which vessels of fetal origin usually connect them. The vessels are supported only by communicating membranes. If the communicating membranes do not have vessels, it is called placenta supuria. Advanced maternal age and in vitro fertilization are known risk factors for the succenturiate placenta.

Circumvallate placenta is an extrachorial, annularly-shaped placenta with raised edges composed of a double fold of chorion, amnion, degenerated decidua, and fibrin deposits. In this condition, the chorionic plate is smaller than the basal plate, resulting in hematoma retention in the placental margin. It is associated with increased risk of vaginal bleeding beginning in the first trimester, premature rupture of the membranes (PROM), preterm delivery, and placental abruption.

Circummarginate placenta is an extrachorial placenta similar to a circumvallate placenta except that the transition from membranous to villous chorion is flat. This form is clinically insignificant.

Placenta membranacea is a rare placental abnormality where chorionic villi cover fetal membranes either completely (diffuse placenta membranacea) or partially (partial placenta membranacea), and the placenta develops as a thin structure occupying the entire periphery of the chorion.

Battledore Placenta is a term describing a placenta where the umbilical cord is attached at the margin. It occurs in 7- 8% in singleton pregnancies and 24-28% in twin pregnancies and may affect placental function/fetal growth.


Abnormal Placental or Cord Location

Placental location can be confidently established by abdominal and transvaginal ultrasound studies. Low-lying placentation, present in up to 60% of early second trimester studies, persists as placenta previa in only 1% to 2% of patients at term. Fetal vessels near the cervix can be visualized using color Doppler, facilitating the diagnosis of funic (umbilical cord) presentation and vasa previa (fetal vessels overlying the os). Normally inserted centrally in the placenta, the umbilical cord may later, as a result of asymmetric placental growth, be located marginally or even on adjacent membranes; in the latter position, traumatic lacerations, hemorrhage and compression-linked heart rate changes are potential consequences.


Morbidly Adherent Placenta (MAP)

Morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) or placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) encompasses the histopathological diagnoses of placenta accreta (a small focus or more generalized muscular invasion), placenta increta (deeper myometrial invasion up to the uterine serosal layer) and placenta percreta (through the serosa to adjacent visceral or vascular structures) [1-3]. It is potentially life threatening, as forced removal of an abnormally invasive placenta can lead to catastrophic maternal hemorrhage; management of all but the most circumscribed lesions usually require hysterectomy.

PAS was previously diagnosed only when failed attempts to remove the placenta were followed by massive bleeding. Improvements in antenatal diagnosis enabled reductions in maternal mortality and morbidity by allowing planned cesarean delivery at 34-35 weeks by experienced multidisciplinary teams [1]. Placental accretion is significantly more likely in women with the combination of placenta previa and a history of one or more cesarean sections, after myomectomy or curettage, and with high parity [1]. The frequency of accretion, now complicating 1/2,500 deliveries, has increased more than 10-fold in the past 20 years, echoing rising cesarean rates [1].

Sonographic criteria for placenta accreta were developed using conventional gray-scale, 2D and 3D color and power Doppler transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography in high-risk women. In the early first trimester between 6- 9 weeks, ultrasound markers of PAS include low implantation of the gestational sac and cesarean scar pregnancy [4]. Studies show that most PAS cases have a low implantation in the early first trimester scans; however, low implantation is noted in only 28 percent in the late first trimester [4]. In addition, elevated maternal serum levels of PAPP-A in the first trimester has been linked to risk for placental accretion [3]. A cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is diagnosed if the chorionic sac is adjacent to or embedded in the scar of a previous cesarean delivery, in close proximity to the bladder, wedged in a niche, and demonstrates extensive vascularization or an arteriovenous malformation. CSP is considered as a precursor of PAS, as histopathology of both appear indistinguishable [5]. The implantation in the niche rather than the scar, and a thin remaining myometrium may be helpful to define cases that will evolve into the most severe types of PAS [6].

In the late first, second, and third trimester, the sonographic characteristics of PAS are lacunae (multiple large sonolucent spaces in the placenta), abnormal uteroplacental interface (described as loss/irregularity of the echo-free “clear space” between the uterus and the placental basal plate, myometrial thinning, or increased vascularity on Doppler), abnormal uterovesical interface (bridging vessels extending from the placenta across the myometrium and/ or beyond the serosa, increased vascularity between the uterus and bladder, and interruption of the bladder wall), placental bulge and exophytic mass (diagnostic for placenta percreta)7. Among these markers, loss of the clear zone performs best with a sensitivity of 84 % and a specificity of 82 % with a diagnostic odds ratio of 24 in the late first trimester, i.e., at 11-14 weeks [7]. Coexisting markers such as lacunae or bladder wall interruption increases the diagnostic performance7. In the second and third trimester, the presence of large multiple lacunae (>3) with irregular borders and high turbulent flow is the most sensitive marker with a negative predictive value of 88% to 100%. The presence of an exophytic mass or placental bulge increases the risk for deep invasion, i.e., increata or percreta [4]. In a recent study the European Working Group on Abnormally Invasive Placenta, the researchers have suggested a total of 10 sonographic finding detected by 2D grayscale and color Doppler study to be very helpful in diagnosing abnormally invasive placenta45.Combined sonographic markers perform the best with 81% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity with a PPV of 91% and NPV of 98% [8].

Antepartum diagnosis of abnormal placental attachment permits multidisciplinary planning for prematurity management, anesthesia, transfusion, hemostatic and uterotonic medications, balloon tamponade, arterial embolization, or scheduled preterm (around 34-35 weeks) cesarean-hysterectomy prior to onset of labor1. MRI mapping is most helpful when there is posterior placentation, suspected lateral extension, after myomectomies, for evaluation of adjacent viscera with percreta or when ultrasound findings are ambiguous [9].


Placental Abruption

Placental abruption is defined as complete or partial separation of the placenta from the myometrium that presents with hemorrhage in the retroplacental, subchorionic or placental chorionic space on ultrasound. Most patients have pain and bleeding except for rare cases of concealed abruption. The diagnosis of placental abruption remains a clinical one due to low diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound. The role of imaging in this disorder is to exclude placenta previa and other sources of bleeding. One series reported 24% sensitivity and 53% negative predictive value for ultrasound diagnosis of abruption [10]. However, positive ultrasound findings indicated severe abruption and were associated with need for aggressive management and increased risk of adverse outcome [10]. Subchorionic hematomas are often noted on transvaginal scans early in gestation; symptomaticity, size, and persistence have been traditionally linked to poorer outcomes such as abortion, stillbirth, preterm delivery and preterm membrane rupture [11]. On the contrary, two recent studies reported that subchorionic hematomas were not independent risk factors for adverse outcome when controlled for maternal risk factors, vaginal bleeding, and gestational age [12,13]. Later placental abruptions are more difficult to visualize; acute bleeding is isoechoic with placenta and can be mistaken for placentomegaly. Hypoechoic fluid collections and hyperechoic infarcted areas appear in more chronic presentations. Abruption can accompany fetal growth restriction and can present with Breus’ mole characterized as a massive subchorionic collection on the chorionic side of the placenta [14].


Abnormal Placental Location

Placenta previa is defined as placenta overlying the internal os. In the second trimester, placenta previa or a low-lying placenta with the inferior edge 2cm from the internal os is seen frequently, approximately in 5-20% of the ultrasound studies [15]. The prevalence decreases to 0.3-0.5% at term [15]. A posterior lowpositioned placenta is more likely to persist into the third trimester [15]. Transvaginal ultrasound is superior to transabdominal approach and is safe for evaluation of placenta previa. A persistent low-lying placenta or placenta previa is an indication for cesarean delivery and follow up scans are recommended at 32 weeks and 36 weeks for delivery planning [16].


Vasa Previa

Vasa previa is characterized by the presence of unprotected fetal blood vessels by the umbilical cord or placenta over the cervical os or within 2cm from the cervical os. It complicates 1 in 2500 deliveries. Membrane rupture prior to or labor can lead to fetal hemorrhage, exsanguination, and death and sequela in survivors [17]. Prenatal identification prior to onset of labor or rupture of membranes improves survival to 98.6% from 72% and intact survival to 96.7% from 28.1% [17]. Ultrasound study typically shows fetal vessels over the cervical os that appears like bubbles or lines on gray scale. Fetal arterial waveforms can be confirmed by Doppler. Vessels with venous flow should be followed to their origin if possible to differentiate maternal vessels. Low-lying placenta, resolved placenta previa, velamentous cord insertion, accessory lobes, bilobed placenta, multiple pregnancies, and artificial reproductive therapy increase the risk of vasa previa. In these cases, consideration should be given to rule out vasa previa, preferably by transvaginal imaging [18].


Placental Cystic Structures

Placental lakes are hypoechoic spaces with slow venous flow and are benign findings; however, they need to be differentiated from retroplacental or subchorionic hemorrhage. Despite their ominous appearance they are not associated with maternal of fetal morbidity.

Partial or complete mole in the first trimester, placenta accreta spectrum, mesenchymal dysplasia, chorioangioma and confined placental mosaicism can present with cystic spaces in the placenta [19].

Chorangioma usually presents as a solitary nodule or, less frequently, as multiple nodules. Its frequency is about 1%, even though literature reports vary [20]. It is a benign, biologically indolent neoplasm, frequently referred to as placental hemangioma or haemangioblastoma. It is found on the fetal surface of the placenta or in placental parenchyma. Most chorangiomas are small and possess no clinical significance. On the contrary, clinically significant chorangiomas, greater than 5cm or multiple chorangiomas, may be associated with pregnancy complications.

Chorangioma is a nontrophoblastic tumor characterized by abnormal vascular development within the placental parenchyma, which is most frequently observed in the third, and less frequently in the second trimester of pregnancy [20]. It is usually an incidental microscopic finding. Even though it has no fibrous capsule, it is sharply demarcated from the surrounding placental parenchyma by a single or, less frequently, double layer of chorionic epithelium. It is most frequently found on the fetal surface of the placenta, often in the vicinity of the umbilical cord insertion, with larger tumors being usually attached to the chorion. On gross examination, it is well-circumscribed, with fleshy, congested, red to tan cut surface. It is microscopically composed of numerous proliferative blood vessels in various stages of differentiation, from capillary to cavernous [20].

Clinically significant chorangiomas, greater than 5cm or multiple, may be associated with fetal hydramnios, hemorrhage, premature delivery, premature placental separation and placenta previa [20]. These manifestations may result in severe fetal distress and intrauterine death. They may also lead to nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Anemia, thrombocytopenia or congestive cardiac failure may be seen in a neonate.

Differential diagnosis of chorangioma includes chorangiosis and chorangiomatosis, that presents as diffuse or more often a focal proliferation of villous angioblastema with villi that are not present in chorangioma21. Chorangiosis is a proliferation of capillaries in terminal chorionic villi and is considered to be a marker for hypoxia and poor clinical outcome. Focal chorangiosis is associated with a decrease in Apgar scores, increased placental weight, fetal vascular thrombosis (fetal vascular malperfusion), umbilical cord abnormalities, increased fetal nucleated red blood cells, and villous dysmaturity [21].

The hallmark of diffuse chorangiomatosis is capillary dysvasculogenesis, diffusely involving the placenta causing massive placental enlargement. It has been associated with fetal cardiomegaly, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia [22].


Placental Viral and Parasitic Villitis

Chronic inflammatory lesions of the placenta are characterized by the infiltration of the organ by lymphocytes, plasma cells, and/ or macrophages and may result from infections (viral, bacterial, parasitic) or be of immune origin (maternal anti-fetal rejection) [23]. The 3 major lesions are villitis (when the inflammatory process affects the villous tree), chronic chorioamnionitis (which affects the chorioamniotic membranes), and chronic deciduitis (which involves the decidua basalis). Maternal cellular infiltration is a common feature of the lesions. Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) is a destructive villous inflammatory lesion that is characterized by the infiltration of maternal T cells (CD8+ cytotoxic T cells) into chorionic villi [23].

Chronic placental inflammatory lesions can be due to maternal anti-fetal rejection, a process associated with the development of a novel form of fetal systemic inflammatory response. The syndrome is characterized by an elevation of the fetal plasma T-cell chemokine [23].

Recently Shanes, et al. have reported on placental pathology from 16 patients with COVID-19 infection [24]. No pathognomonic features were identified; however, there were increased rates of maternal vascular malperfusion features and intervillous thrombi, suggesting a common theme of abnormal maternal circulation, as well as an increased incidence of chorangiosis. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the observed epidemiologic associations between COVID-19 in pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes. Collectively, these findings suggest that increased antenatal surveillance for women diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 may be warranted [24].


Placental Vascular Malperfusion

Fetal vascular malperfusion is the most recent term applied to a group of placental lesions indicating reduced or absent perfusion of the villous parenchyma by the fetus. The most common etiology of malperfusion is umbilical cord obstruction leading to stasis, ischemia, and in some cases thrombosis [25]. Other contributing factors may include maternal diabetes, fetal cardiac insufficiency or hyper viscosity, and inherited or acquired thrombophilia. Severe or high grade fetal vascular malperfusion is an important risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction, fetal CNS injury, and stillbirth. Overall recurrence risk for subsequent pregnancies is low [25].


For More Open Access Journals in Iris Publishers Please Click on: https://irispublishers.com/
For More Information: https://irispublishers.com/wjgwh/fulltext/common-placental-abnormalities-review.ID.000608.php

 



Thursday, 18 November 2021

Iris Publishers_World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health (WJGWH)

Early Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction Outcomes: Non- Chemical-Based Method Yield Improved Pregnancy Rates and Minimized Risks

Abstract

Objectives: Multifetal pregnancies increase the risk of maternal and perinatal mortality and reducing to a lower-order pregnancy attenuates this risk. We assessed a non-chemical-based procedure for multifetal pregnancy reduction.

Methods: A single-arm prospective study was conducted between December 2013 and September 2018 on patients with trichorionic triamniotic pregnancies (n=296). Multifetal pregnancy reduction was performed between gestational weeks 5 and 10. Using the same equipment for transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte recovery, an echo-tipped needle (17 Cook medical ovum aspiration needle) was inserted into the embryo’s cardiac area until the absence of fetal heartbeat. Afterward, the needle was extracted, and the hemostasis/vitality of the remaining embryos was verified. Patients were followed until delivery, where the birth weight was recorded as well as any complications.

Results: None of the women presented or indicated any surgical-related complications. Three patients lost their pregnancies (1.0%); however, 89.9% maintained the remaining two gestational sacs and 9.1% retained one gestational sac. The live birth rates were 95.1% for the two gestational sacs (birth weight: 2135±586 grams) and 96.3% for one gestational sac (birth weight: 2546±636 grams). The birth weight was significantly better in pregnancies that resulted in one gestational sac (p=0.001). There was a significant difference in the low birth weight rate (two sacs: 26.9% v one sac: 58.4%) but not with the very low birth weight rate (two sacs: 9.1% v one sac: 7.7%).

Conclusions: Here, we demonstrate that a non-chemical method can successfully reduce the number of embryos avoiding complications and allowing pregnancy.

Keywords: Embryo reduction; High-order multiple pregnancies; Pregnancy outcomes; Selective termination; Trichorionic triplet pregnancy


Introduction

Procedures to increase the success of achieving a clinical pregnancy include implanting multiple embryos; however, this has had many unforeseen risks [1]. The risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss is 25% for quadruplets, 15% for triplets, and 8% for twins [2]. Moreover, multifetal pregnancies increase maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [3]. Maternal risks of multifetal pregnancies include hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and postpartum hemorrhage [4,5]. Implementing multifetal pregnancy reduction during assisted reproduction technologies when three or more fetuses are present has become a common practice.

According to Liu, et al. the optimal strategy for multifetal pregnancy reduction has not been elucidated [6]. Multifetal pregnancy reduction is typically scheduled between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation, known as late reduction, with most common procedures requiring the use of chemical substances, such as potassium chloride (KCl), as an adjuvant or gestational sac aspiration to improve the embryo reduction success rate [7]. Even though these procedures have improved assisted reproduction technology outcomes, under certain circumstances, these procedures present with significant complications, ranging from increased miscarriage rates to abdominal pain to maternal distress [8-10]. The proposed mechanisms postulated for these effects include procedure-related trauma, infection, over-activation of the maternal immune system due to the resorbing of dead fetoplacental tissue, feticide-promoted hemorrhage leading to the death or impaired development of the remaining fetus(es), or that the KCl from the injection transfers to another fetus via the intertwine placental vascular anastomoses [11,12,9,13]. Lastly, when late reduction could be or is not possible, alternative techniques, such as early reductions, should be considered. Certain circumstances include but are not limited to cervical ectopic pregnancy, placental complications, compromised embryo development, in which all implantations may suffer from prolonged intervention. With more unsatisfactory results associated with early reductions compared to late reductions concerning procedure-related fetal or pregnancy loss, augmented miscarriage rates, preterm delivery, and birth weight [14,15], the early reduction techniques need improvement. Therefore, we present a non-chemical-based method for fetal reduction, performed during early gestation.

Materials and Methods

Patients and study approval

Between December 2013 and September 2018, patients with trichorionic triamniotic triplets were asked to participate in this single-arm prospective study. To be included in the study, women had to be attending the Ingenes Institute for advanced maternal age without any other cause of female infertility and underwent a standardized in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocol. Exclusion criteria were an ectopic pregnancy, not willing to accept the procedure, or monetary issues. Options were explained to the patients and presented with embryo reduction as an alternative. They were explained the potential problems with the procedure.

IVF and pregnancy evaluation

All patients underwent a 10-day controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists. Ovarian response was assessed by monitoring follicular development by ultrasound examination and measuring serum estradiol levels. Oocyte retrieval was conducted 36 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration (10,000 IU Choragon Ferring Laboratories or 6500 IU Ovidrel, Merck Laboratories, Naucalpan de Juárez, Estado de México, México). At the end of hormonal stimulation, oocyte collection was performed under general anesthesia. To follow and locate mature follicles, transvaginal ultrasound was used. Ovulation was induced with hCG. Using a specialized suction system, 3–5 ml of follicular fluid containing the oocytes was extracted.

Samples were analyzed using a stereoscopic microscope to locate the oocytes, which were kept at 37.5 °C in an 8.3% CO2 atmosphere until fertilization. Only the highest quality embryos were transferred, and pregnancy was diagnosed by β-hCG values >10 mUI/ml (Day 14) as well the presence of a fetal heartbeat, confirmed by ultrasound at 6–8 weeks. An embryologist monitored and recorded information about embryo development, embryo morphology, transfer, and pregnancy. Low birth weight was defined as a delivery weight below 2,500 grams and very low birth weight below 1,500 grams. Using the World Health Organization criteria, preterm births were categorized as either extremely preterm (less than 28 weeks), very preterm (28 to 32 weeks), moderate to late preterm (33 to 37 weeks)[16]. Birth weight discordance was calculated using the formula: (birth weight of the larger twin – birth weight of the smaller twin)/birth weight of the larger twin [17]. Pregnancy loss due to the procedure was defined as a loss of pregnancy within three weeks of the procedure as indicated by Evans, et al. [18] and Timor- Tritsch, et al. [19], whereas miscarriages were defined as a pregnancy loss before 24 weeks and abortion was defined as a pregnancy loss after 24 weeks.

Embryo reduction

Patients without spontaneous pregnancy reduction were counseled about multifetal pregnancy reduction at our facilities. The probable complications of multiple fetal pregnancies and the risks and benefits of multifetal pregnancy reduction were explained. The doctors gave advice about which embryo should be reduced according to the embryos’ condition and position. Final decisions about whether to undergo multifetal pregnancy reduction and retained embryos were made by the patients, depending on their religious beliefs and personal preference.

Before the procedure, an ultrasound scan was performed using a 5.0 MHz transducer (Panavista-VA GM-2600A, Matsushita, Japan) to determine the location of the pregnancy and the size of the fetus and gestational sac. The embryos were observed, and an embryo was chosen for reduction based on its proximity to the cervix as well as the presence of an unfavorable prognosis. Fetal heartbeats were confirmed for each fetus before starting the procedure. Under general anesthesia, after patients had been placed into the lithotomy position, the vagina was prepared with 10% povidone-iodine and thoroughly rinsed with sterile saline solution. Prophylactic antibiotic (2.0g Cefalotin, intravenous injection) was administered one h before the procedure. Under on-screen sonographer guidance, the fetus was approached transvaginal through the anterior fornix with a 17-gauge COOK needle (COOK Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) for embryo reduction. A cardiac puncture was performed. The transuterine puncture was carried out until reaching the fetus’s heart. From there, a direct intracardiac puncture was performed, where the needle was repeatedly rotated 90 degrees or by making continuous punctures in the cardiac area until evidence of cessation of the cardiac activity. After ensuring that no fetal heartbeat occurred, the needle was withdrawn. There was no need for suction. Ultrasonic graphic presentation of the procedure is presented in Figure 1. Following the procedure, vaginal hemostasis revision was performed. Patients were followed until delivery and the birth weight was recorded as well as any complications.

Statistical analysis

The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine if the data were normally distributed. Either the Chi2 test, Mann–Whitney U test, or Student’s t-test was used to examining differences between groups. P-values <0.05 (two-tailed) were considered significant. All analyses were carried out with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software v26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

For this proof of principle study, we only approached patients with three gestational sacs (trichorionic triamniotic), which were reduced down to two. Two hundred ninety-six patients agreed to participate out of 407. The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. For the women who choose not to proceed, the top reasons were personal reasons/choices, religious beliefs, and economic causes. Embryo reduction typically took place during the 7th week (range: 5-10.5 weeks). The procedural time was 15 minutes. None of the women presented or indicated any complications due to the surgery.

After the procedure, three patients lost their pregnancy (1.0%) due to the procedure (within three weeks); however, 89.9% maintained the remaining two gestational sacs and 9.1% for one gestational sac. The live birth rates were 95.1% for the two gestational sacs and 96.3% for one gestational sac (Table 1). There was no difference in the live birth rate (p=0.784). Even though there was no difference in the gestational age at birth, the one gestational sac group had more full-term deliveries, and the two gestational sacs group had more moderate to late preterm deliveries. Interestingly, there was no difference between the groups with respect to preterm deliveries <33 weeks. For patients in which the reduction led to 1 gestational sac, there was a significant benefit concerning birth weight (p=0.001). When the birth weight was stratified into normal, low, and very low, there was a significant difference in the low birth rate but not the very low birth weight (Table 1). The most common fetal complication for the two gestational sacs group was the pregnancy that required neonatal intensive care unit intervention (4.5%), whereas for the one gestational sac group was the restriction of intrauterine growth (14.8%, Table 2).

For More Open Access Journals in Iris Publishers Please Click on: https://irispublishers.com/

For More Information:
https://irispublishers.com/wjgwh/fulltext/early-multifetal-pregnancy-reduction-outcomes-non-chemical-based-method-yield-improved-pregnancy.ID.000607.php 


Monday, 15 November 2021

Iris Publishers_World Journal of Gynecology & Womens Health (WJGWH)

Outpatient Hysteroscopy for the Management of Intrauterine Disorders: Feasibility, Effectiveness and Safety For 3000 Cases


Summary

Study objective: To assess the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of outpatient hysteroscopies performed in an Office Hysteroscopy Unit.

Design: Retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data in an office hysteroscopy unit database (Canadian Task Force II-2). The study was approved by our hospital’s ethical committee.

Setting: Tertiary care university hospital.

Patients: Included consecutively were 3000 patients who underwent outpatient hysteroscopy between May 2008 and October 2019.

Interventions: Outpatient hysteroscopy was performed using a rigid 5-6 mm diameter device when indicated for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.

Measurements and Main Results: Feasibility, effectiveness and safety results were evaluated. Outpatient hysteroscopies were successfully performed in 94.5% of cases, with failed hysteroscopies amounting to just 5.5% of cases. Effectiveness was 87.4%, with just 12.6% of women rescheduled for hysteroscopy in a surgical setting. There were no complications in 99% of patients; the main complications otherwise were vasovagal response and uterine perforation (28 and 2 cases, respectively), neither of which required further intervention other than antibiotic treatment and clinical observation.

Conclusion: The results for 3000 outpatient hysteroscopies indicate that office hysteroscopy is a feasible, effective and safe approach to managing most cases of common benign intrauterine disorders. These encouraging results would suggest that outpatient hysteroscopy should be a first line approach to the management of intrauterine conditions.

Keywords: Effectiveness; Feasibility; First line treatment; Office hysteroscopy; Outpatient hysteroscopy; Safety


Introduction

Benign intracavitary intrauterine disorders are common gynaecological conditions. Technical improvements in hysteroscopy instruments, increasingly narrow devices and new kinds of equipment mean that most such disorders can be dealt with using a see-and-treat minimally invasive outpatient approach [1].

The main indications for office hysteroscopy include diagnosis and management of most benign intrauterine disorders, such as abnormal bleeding in premenopausal and postmenopausal women [2,3] focal intrauterine lesions (endometrial polyps or fibroids) [3,4] intrauterine adhesions [5,6] uterine malformations [7,8] retained products of conception [3,9,10] retained intrauterine devices3 and subfertility studies [3].

Outpatient management minimizes patient risk associated with surgery, general anaesthesia and hospitalization [11] especially in women with significant medical comorbidities, while also allowing them to rapidly return to their daily routines [12]. The burden for the healthcare system is also less, bearing in mind costs associated with surgery and hospitalization [13]. Current guidelines recommend that at least 80% and a targeted 90% of diagnostic hysteroscopies should be performed on an outpatient basis [3] suggesting that hysteroscopy in a surgical setting should be reserved only for cases that cannot be successfully managed in an outpatient setting.

Reliable results for outpatient hysteroscopy may help consolidate it as a first line approach to managing most intrauterine disorders [4,11]. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility, effectiveness and safety for 3000 outpatient hysteroscopies performed in our hospital over an 11-year period.

Methodology

Design and sample

This retrospective observational study was based on a prospectively collected database of 3000 consecutive hysteroscopies performed in the 11 years between May 2008 and October 2019 in our Office Hysteroscopy Unit. The study was approved by our hospital’s ethics committee (IIBSP-FES-2019-96) and is registered at Clinical Trials.gov with accession number NCT04462835.

Data for all included patients were prospectively collected in a computerized database. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was to measure results in terms of feasibility, effectiveness and safety. Feasibility was defined as the proportion of successfully completed explorations, effectiveness was defined as the percentage of cases that that did not require diagnosis or treatment to be completed in a surgical setting , and safety was defined as the percentage of complications recorded.

We also recorded pain intensity, as perceived by the patient during and 10 minutes after the intervention, using a Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

Intervention

Hysteroscopies were performed in the outpatient hysteroscopy box by an experienced gynaecologist assisted by a nurse (Figure 1).

For pain and anxiety management, a painkiller (ibuprofen 600mg) and an anxiolytic (diazepam 5mg) were orally dispensed to patients 30 minutes before the intervention. Cervical preparation, using vaginal misoprostol (400mcg, 4-6 hours before), was performed only in cases of anticipated or previous failed cervical passage. Paracervical anaesthesia was administered in selected cases of severe pain during passage through the cervical canal. Premenopausal women were asked to take, as endometrial preparation, desogestrel 75mg from at least 30 days prior to the intervention. If the patient was unwilling to take desogestrel, the intervention was preferably performed in the early follicular phase.

All hysteroscopies were performed using the vaginoscopy approach. An 0.9% saline solution used as a distension medium was delivered using an automated pressure system (Hysteromat®). The hysteroscopies were performed with, one of the following 5-6mm diameter rigid devices depending on the clinical situation: Minihysteroscope (Olympus)®, scissors, forceps, bipolar electrode (Versapoint®), bipolar Gubbini resector (Colibrí®) or a mechanical morcellator (Myosure® or Truclear®).

Statistical analysis

Categorial variables were expressed as numbers (absolute frequency) and percentages (relative frequency). Quantitative variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). The chi-square test and the t-test were used to analyses proportions and compare means, respectively. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS (V26.0).

Results

For the 3000 outpatient hysteroscopies performed in our hospital in the 11-year period of study, the main characteristics of the sample, indications and additional procedures are represented in Table 1.

Table 2 shows feasibility rates and reasons for failures, with only 5.5% of procedures (166/3000) failing overall.

Discussion

Our findings would suggest that outpatient hysteroscopy is a feasible, effective and safe technique to manage with most benign intrauterine conditions.

Concerning feasibility, our 94.5% rate surpasses the 90% outpatient hysteroscopy recommended in the literature [3] while our failure rate of 5.5% is coherent with the 6%-9.5% rate reported in recent studies [11,14,15].

Our high effectiveness rate (87.4%) meant that just 12.6% of our patients required surgical hysteroscopy. This has benefits for the patient in terms of waiting lists, a simplified intervention, less risk (associated with surgery, general anaesthesia and hospitalization) [11] an early return to routine [12] and a shorter sick leave period. It also reduces the burden on the healthcare system, in terms of direct and indirect costs associated with hospital admission and surgery.

Our complications rate of 1% was similar to the 0.5% reported by Capmas, et al. [15] likewise for a large cohort of cases (n=2402).

One of the main problems of outpatient hysteroscopy may be the pain experienced by patients during the intervention. Most of our patients reported high VNRS scores (mean 5.90 of a maximum of 10) that dropped by 10 minutes after the hysteroscopy. Pain did not represent an impediment to performing most hysteroscopies, however, as only 22 interventions failed due to pain.

Note that a more recent indication for hysteroscopy, whose acceptability is growing, is the removal of retained products of conception. The incidence of intrauterine adherences is significantly reduced by hysteroscopic resection (13%) compared to dilation and curettage (30%) [16]. Hysteroscopy also has the advantage that full evacuation of the uterine cavity can be confirmed visually.

The main strength of this study is the large number of analyzed hysteroscopies, the use of a standard approach and intervention by a limited number of professionals. To our knowledge no such study based on our population has been reported in the literature.

A limitation of the study it that while the data was prospectively collected, the design has to be considered retrospective. Another limitation is that potentially useful information such as parity, previous vaginal delivery, ethnicity and patient satisfaction data were not collected in our database.

Conclusion

Our findings show that outpatient hysteroscopy is a feasible, effective and safe approach to managing the most common cases of benign intrauterine disorders, with clear benefits for both the patient and the healthcare system.

These encouraging results would suggest that outpatient hysteroscopy should be considered as a first line approach to the management of most cases of benign intrauterine disorders.

For More Open Access Journals in Iris Publishers Please Click on: https://irispublishers.com/

For More Information: 
https://irispublishers.com/wjgwh/fulltext/outpatient-hysteroscopy-for-the-management-of-intrauterine-disorders.ID.000606.php